Saturday, September 26, 2009

Synergeyes Multifocal Reviews

Clearstream Pérol, Lahoud, ministers and other invited themselves to the menu. Have they eaten De Villepin?

Nothing is clear in this case, it is perhaps the expense of Imad Lahoud. The president is working night and day and the G20 does not bother with trivialities such as the presumption of innocence or the "butcher's hooks" to which he wants to hang his enemies. Without doubt he has chosen to be above the fray, too busy giving lessons to B. Obama knew siege united nations. Its pathetic way of engaging the president of the united states in this forum, something that probably cost him more than once twisted from the U.S. administration. Bush's advisers did not like according to the latest rumors.

When Lahoud attended Pérol, former deputy director of the firm
Sarkozy (20 minutes)
REVELATIONS - A report submitted in 2008 to judges investigating the Clearstream affair claims the alleged forger also had relationships with current ministers ...
Who handled that? This is a question more than ever the focus of the trial proceedings Clearstream. A four-page report issued in 2008 to judges investigating the case, and revealed Saturday by the Journal du Dimanche, shows Imad Lahoud, who is suspected of falsifying the Clearstream files, dating in 2004 and 2005 the former Secretary General of the Elysee Perol and present members of the government and Nathalie Kosciusko-Morizet Eric Woerth.

According to the report, officers of the Division of Financial Investigations (Dnif) identified the hospitality and catering Imad Lahoud reimbursed by his former employer, EADS, in 2004 and 2005, totaling close to 16,000 euros, according to several sources familiar with the matter.

>> Find all our articles about the Clearstream case here

As revealed during the trial by counsel Dominique de Villepin, Imad Lahoud and lunched with fifteen times Perol, who was then deputy director of cabinet of Nicolas Sarkozy, then economy minister.

In Defense of Dominique de Villepin,
these meetings might as well show that is Nicolas Sarkozy who has used the case against former Prime Minister, not the reverse.

Okay introduced
Imad Lahoud would also, according to police, organized February 25, 2004, just weeks before sending fake listings to justice, a reception attended by Perol Gilles Grapinet, Councillor Jean -Pierre Raffarin at Matignon and brother of Dominique de Villepin, Michel Piloquet.

Later, we learn that May 5, 2005, is the current budget minister Eric Woerth, that invites Imad Lahoud, whose wife, Anne-Gabrielle Heilbronner, then directs the firm. Similarly, the current Secretary of State for the Digital Economy, Nathalie Kosciusko-Morizet, shared twice with her husband at the time an executive at EADS, the table of Imad Lahoud.

The report finally reveals that the alleged forger also lunched with Bernard Casanova, then close to Bernard Squarcini, the current head of the Central Directorate of Internal Intelligence (DCRI) and Brigitte Henry, who was then working with the Central Intelligence Director General (CDSR), Yves Bertrand.

NB with agency

Destiny and turbulence - Madrid.

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

Philco Pas1028 Operating Instructions

Nicolas Sarkozy and Justice party, or how the mask is dropped.

is taken as is, it is no need to add more. go, if we add a little, because this is obviously not a slip, Nicolas Sarkozy is vindictive ... the president does is maybe not him. But that dominates Dr. Jekyll or Mr. Hyde? It is certain that the function does not the man in this case, both in substance and in form we are in a sad time in what should be a place above the melee.


The judge's impartiality
(for your culture)
And Nicolas Sarkozy skidded
(Pascale Robert-Diard, columnist judicial World)
From New York, where he is live on TF1 and France 2, Nicolas Sarkozy was asked about the Clearstream affair and attacks against him by Dominique de Villepin. He replied: "after a lengthy investigation, two independent judges felt that
perpetrators should be referred to the criminal court ...
"
The sentence is immediately transmitted to Mr. Olivier Metzner, a lawyer Dominique de Villepin that interrupts the hearing and read the statement. The word "guilty", Mr Sarkozy's lawyer, Thierry Herzog Me, marks the spot. The entire room is suspended following the remarks of Mr. Metzner.
He continues: "That is the respect of your court? your floor? That a president gives to France as a show of justice? The presumption of innocence is a fundamental right. And President of the Republic violates live before millions of French! We already wanted to hang Dominique de Villepin to "fangs". Now they say already guilty! ".

Mr. Herzog does not believe his ears, and seeks at all costs to verify the connection, the phone hanged. He hesitated to respond, then fails.

outdoors Metzner announced to Me cameras that he will file a complaint against Nicolas Sarkozy for the presumption of innocence.

Destiny and turbulence - Madrid.

Monday, September 21, 2009

How Do You Know You Have Have Ball Cancer

Case de Villepin. The function does not the man or the president that the function does not grow.

President, so that the hooks of butchers, one whose sense of the state, the grandeur of France passes a second plane when its cold vengeance comes before everything. The merits of the case is irrelevant in the end, we of fact in a schoolyard with a desire to see blood splattering the walls, there can be other reasons for this comedy!
Regardless of the course of this trial, and yet with Nicolas Sarkozy, Dominique de Villepin will remain in the memories of many who opposed Bush and his murderous madness, no doubt one more thing that does this president be liable that the function does not grow.

The endless inventory of appearing or not, gives us an idea of the show that Nicolas Sarkozy offers to the world, this same world he wants to give driving lessons at the G20 summit.


A president of the republic,
    A former British prime minister,
  • Another former prime minister,
  • Two or three ministers and former ministers,
  • Sercices The elite of the French secret
  • Part of EADS , una
  • Surely part of Thales,
  • Journalists,
  • underlings,
  • bankers I guess
  • This case leaves us who unleashed the PS and its stories as childish. God! (And I'm atheist), the right may no longer be the dumbest in the world, but also can offer us his live suicide. What will France do not UMP, without PS after their two suicides live.

De Villepin when he arrived at the courthouse in Paris:


"I am here by the will of a man. I am here by the relentlessness of a man, Nicolas Sarkozy, who is also president of the French Republic. I leave it free and milled on behalf of the French people, "said Mr. de Villepin when he arrived at the courthouse.

Jaws clenched, looking solemn, former Prime Minister added: "Some would believe that no country in our political process. I also believe, and yet here we are in 2009 and we are in France. "

Destiny and turbulence - Madrid.

Friday, September 11, 2009

Car Trailer Legislation Ontario

Hortefeux wins points for its early retirement

I was not so hot to me too after seeing the video, not clear enough. But after reading the transcript, and given the context, there is hardly any doubt and I would even say "this funny cartoon Umps. As for Jean Francois Cope, said he leaves, right?
What Hortefeux really said

LEMONDE.FR (BH): I am JFC Auvergne: Auvergne It is a tragedy is a drama BH: ... Anyway, I'll make an exception. Young activist

(Amin), but I put myself between the two

BH: that between the two.
JFC: yes ... there is no problem.

Participants: Amine, Amine ... One participant
: Ah, Amin is the integration, it is integration. A participant
: Amine, frankly ...
Hortefeux: "It is much bigger than us and more [about the young man].
Another participant: "He, he speaks Arabic."

(Laughter from the meeting)

Jean-Francois Cope: "Do not be fooled, these are socialist infiltrators".
One participant: "He is Catholic, he eats pork and drinks beer."
Hortefeux: "Ah but it does not, then it does not correspond at all to the prototype, then. It's not that at all."

(laughter of the assembly)

A participant: It's our little Arabic.
Hortefeux: "Well, fine. It is always one. When there is one, that's fine. It's when there are many problems there. Come on, good luck ..."

Destiny and turbulence - Madrid.